Category Archives: Paul

Forty Answers

  1. Paper
  2. Mary Ann
  3. Briefs
  4. Shower
  5. Xbox
  6. Facebook
  7. Science
  8. Summer
  9. Tom
  10. N’Sync
  11. Pen
  12. Digital
  13. DVR
  14. Dark
  15. Football
  16. Pizza Hut
  17. Dog
  18. Deaf
  19. E-mail
  20. NEITHER!
  21. Half full
  22. Gym
  23. Stick
  24. Texting
  25. Simple
  26. Silence
  27. Make
  28. Star
  29. CD’s
  30. South
  31. PM
  32. Book
  33. Newspaper
  34. Beginning
  35. Glasses
  36. Brunette
  37. Hot
  38. On
  39. Geek
  40. Country

1 Comment

Filed under Curiosities, Paul

Take The Time To Think

At the moment I’m feeling a bit frustrated, overwhelmed, disappointed – the song lyrics that come to mind (I often frame things in terms of song lyrics or movie scenes & quotes) are from Tonio K’s “American Love Affair”:

…she should know better
But no one’s let her
Take the time to think at all
Much less think twice…

Seeing the keystones and the linchpins is always a key to being successful, and more importantly, the keys to being effective and efficient. Again speaking in metaphors and analogies, given that the original job was to drain the swamp, now that we’re up to our asses in alligators, what can we do to not just get out of the mess we’re in, but to also succeed in the original goal and move on. We could flail away at the “alligators” and flounder around in the “swamp” and slog through the mess as best we can, but is there a way to solve the problems in an innovative way, saving massive amounts of time and effort?

Can we even see what the problems are to begin with? Do we have the opportunity to step back and take a breath and look at a bigger picture, or do we not have time to think at all, much less think twice?

As always, I know from experience that the best course is often a combination of strategies and efforts. Start by just plowing ahead, slogging as best you can, and never giving up, but also keeping your eyes open, maintaining situational awareness, and being ready to jump on any opportunities or take reasonable risks when another course of action (the innovation mentioned above) becomes available.

There’s a common diagram that probably has a lot of truth to it:

The only change I would make would be in the relative size of the two circles, but that may be part of why it can be hard for me to make the leap. I think that the “comfort zone” is the much, much bigger circle – that’s where the slogging and plowing ahead happens, where there’s no time to think at all.

On the other hand, that comment in itself may be part of the issue – perhaps the “magic” zone truly is the much larger one and that’s the reason that it’s so desirable to leap into it.

On the third hand, my inner cynic notes there’s an awful lot of space outside of the comfort zone that is not where the magic happens – what happens there? I suspect it may not be “magical,” which is why it’s better in the comfort zone.

These are things I think about, and one of the reasons that I’m neither a life coach or a priest.

I’ll let you know if I find any answers. Or clues.

Leave a comment

Filed under Job Hunt, Paul

In Search Of Job Application Middle Ground

I’ve been filling out a lot of job applications for a while now. While I have been to the odd job fair or other event where I hand out resumes and try to meet face-to-face and maybe fill out a quick application by hand, let’s get real – 99% of it these days is done online.

What I’m seeing is two extremes, with damn little room in between. Maybe it’s just wishful thinking, but I can’t help but wonder if the place I’m looking for to get my foot in the door isn’t a place in that sweet spot.

On the one hand, there are plenty of places (through Linkedin or any of the dozens or hundreds of job search engines) where it’s not much more than a one-click  submission. Attach a PDF copy of your resume and click the button. Presto-chango! You’ve applied for the job! You may or may not (bet on “not”) even get an email acknowledging your submission, and 99% of the time you’ll never, ever hear anything back. I have gotten actual responses and even an interview or two from these, but they’re few and far between.

Out at the other extreme, there are places (usually national, big-name companies) that have the most long, drawn-out, odious application processes known to man. These things aren’t job applications, they’re endurance tests. In almost every case I’ve seen, the exact same form is used whether you’re applying for a CFO position or for a graveyard shift janitorial position.

Let me be blunt – that’s a joke. It means that someone in HR isn’t doing their job, or the HR department has been taken over by a deadly infestation of lawyers.

Inevitably these ordeal applications have questions which are totally inapplicable to anyone looking for a management position. I had one for a major hotel chain that wanted to know my high school GPA, the names of three teachers for references, and so on. (I graduated from high school over 40 years ago, I’m not sure how many of my teachers are still alive, I’m not sure how many live ones would remember me, and since I haven’t been in contact with any of them in over 40 years, how could they be a reliable reference?)

Next they wanted to know all of the details for my last five jobs. The assumption here is obviously that everyone moves from job to job every year or so, if that. But I was at my last job for 27 years. To get to my fifth job back in time, you’re talking about the part-time job I had as a junior in high school, busing tables and washing dishes at the Howard Johnsons off of I-89 in central Vermont. Who was my supervisor and what’s their current address and phone number? How in hell should I know?

Best of all, these kinds of applications from hell usually won’t let you put something in such as “Not Applicable” or “None.” The form has spaces to be filled in and damn it you can’t go on to the next page until it’s all filled in completely! And don’t try to put 555-1212 or 867-5309 in there for the phone number…

So in order to simply move forward in the process, there’s no option but to make up answers and try to make them convincing. Or at least, convincing enough to fool the ‘bot running the program. I guess it’s sort of like a CAPTCHA system for job applications, but with a sadistic twist.

And then they want you to swear that everything’s accurate and true, because if it’s not and they find out, they’ll fire you!

If you don’t realize that there are different questions for different types of jobs and job applicants, you’re not living in the same reality I am. It’s not a matter of discrimination or profiling or equality – it’s a matter of common sense. When your last job had a mid-six figure salary and you can only answer the question in terms of “how much did you make an hour and how many hours a week did you work” and there aren’t “legal” answers that fit, you’re doing a lousy job.

Which brings me to my final point on the application from hell procedure – do I really want to work for a company where the first contact I have with them is this kind of nonsense with zero flexibility or common sense? There are only about six places that I would answer “yes” to that question. NASA. JPL. SpaceX. The KC Chiefs. The LA Angels. Virgin Galactic.

Somewhere out there is that middle ground. More than just point and click, less than the Bataan Death March. A way to get a decent first estimate on the question, “Could this person maybe do a good job?” If no, then a polite, “Thanks, but no thanks.” If yes, then a follow-up, with some personal contact, common sense, and the flexibility to ask intelligent questions which could vary depending on the job, the applicant, and even the answers to the earlier questions.

I know there will be folks who say, “You can’t do that! There are too many applicants! You must have a computer or a system to quickly cut down the firehose of applications to a trickle of good candidates!” Perhaps, but if you’re going to do that, maybe you could get a program or system that isn’t totally useless, inflexible, and

Get to know me. Let me get to know you. Maybe the job is so over my head that I don’t stand a prayer. Maybe I’m so overqualified that it’s a waste of my time to show up every day. Maybe I’m perfect but you can only pay 1/3 of what I made before. Maybe you want me to move to Texas or Syria. Maybe you’re a startup with a bunch of millenials in their 20’s and an old fart like me wouldn’t fit in. Maybe you’re a startup with a bunch of millenials in their 20’s and you’ll be amazed that I love Amanda Palmer and EDM and Linkin Park and you need that old fart with decades of experience to give you a heads up when you’re going off the rails.

None of this means that either of us will find each other perfect, or even acceptable. But it might.

Leave a comment

Filed under Death Of Common Sense, Job Hunt, Paul

Guardian Angels

I knew what I was going to write for today’s post, or at least how I was going to write it – then one of those king-sized roadblocks reared up and has me totally flummoxed and unable to continue down that path, at least for today.

I hate it when that happens.

I’m sure I’ll figure out something (probably at about 3 AM in the middle of a really good dream) and carry on that assignment later, but for now…

And there goes my muse / subconscious / guardian angel again. I was just about to bitch about how I had no ideas for tonight, and there was one in the paragraph above, and now there’s another one in this paragraph, just spewing out and staring me in the face.

Let’s go with “guardian angel.”

The tl;dr is, “I’m not a believer, but that’s adult me talking – easily impressionable, seven-year-old me was being molded onto the fast track for Pope, would have believed anything, and had a lot of weird shit put into my head by old fashioned nuns.”

It might be worth talking some nuts and bolts theology with someone someday to see if “guardian angels” are actually a legitimate part of Catholic doctrine. It could be that the concept is just some sort of boogie-man made up by scary nuns to keep little kids in line. I suspect the latter.

The generic public concept is of a heavenly being that’s assigned to watch over us individually, keeping us safe from danger. Such as in the bumper sticker that says, “Don’t drive faster than your guardian angel can fly!” (Why can’t the guardian angel just get into the car with you? Or at least latch onto the roof, facing forward into the wind like a giant supernatural dog would if they stuck their head out of the car window. But then, what if you’ve got a luggage rack? See, this is EXACTLY the sort of thinking that got me in so much trouble with Father Murray and his minions!)

It’s a theme we see in movies and television shows from time to time. “It’s A Good Life!” every Christmas. “Saved By An Angel.” “City Of Angels,” which I’m a total sap about, always crying when Meg Ryan… (OK, no spoilers.) “Here Comes Mister Jordan,” and never that crap remake with Warren Beatty.

Actually, “Dogma,” “Angel Heart,” and “All That Jazz” (one of my all-time favorite films) are more my cup of tea for movies about angels. But, look, there I’ve gone off on a tangent again! Surprise!

The party line from the nuns and priests in the 1960s wasn’t simply that guardian angels were there to protect you. That was part of the job, but they were also there to watch you and rat you out to the Big Guy Upstairs. If you sinned (and by “sinned” they usually meant either thinking on your own or touching yourself in that place, or worse, touching Peggy Sue in her that place) and didn’t fess up to it in Confession, your guardian angel was there to not only bug you about it (a glorified Jiminy Cricket role) but to keep the Powers To Be updated on about what you were unrepentant.

I always wanted to bargain with my guardian angel. I figured there must be something that he wanted that I could get and swap for some slack. But how did I know that it was a “he”? Were there girl guardian angels? Did boys get only boy guardian angels and girls get only girl guardian angels? Or was it random? Could there be a girl guardian angel watching me when I, well, you know? Wouldn’t that be nasty for the boy guardian angels to be watching girls all the time, even when they were taking a bath?

There goes Father Murray again, hitting the sacramental wine! I should probably feel bad about that. Maybe.

Nah.

So “guardian angels” are a convenient and sometimes amusing plot device that the Catholics cooked up (or do any of the Protestant religions have them too? Jews? Muslims?) and as such they make a decent literal plot device for entertainment products. But do they really exist?

Why is it that many of the devout Catholics I’ve met scoff at the idea of alien life in any science fiction story, but they have no problem believing stories about invisible, immortal beings watching over each of us? And how many guardian angels are there, anyway? Human population has gone up drastically in the last couple of centuries – are they making new guardian angels to keep up? Or were there a zillion of them made in those first seven days and most of them have been bored for eons, but now human overpopulation is a full employment program for them? When you die, if you were bad, does the guardian angel get busted for doing a lousy job with you? Do non-Christians or even non-Catholics get guardian angels? If a guardian angel is assigned to someone who doesn’t believe in their existence, do they still have to be on their toes to do a good job?

Oops.

Sorry, Father Murray. My bad. (No — it’s not. Wait. That’s lying, which is a sin. Why didn’t my guardian angel stop me from doing it? Or did I get a guardian angel with a wicked sense of humor and…)

Right!

1 Comment

Filed under Farce, Paul, Religion

Admissions

I ran across this the other day, listed as a “list of reasons for admissions to an asylum in the 1800s.” It may or may not be that – not clear why an 1800s asylum would have a 2010s phone number and website listed. (Ah, it’s a real place in West Virginia, supposedly haunted, now a tourist attraction of sorts.) So probably not quite some internet meme from last year.

Reading through the list, it’s quite a varied selection of things to get locked up for.

IMG_4739

On review, I find that I could be committed for at least twenty-six reasons on the list, and there are those out there who would probably throw in at least a couple more.

I’ll leave it as an exercise to the student to figure out which twenty-six.

1 Comment

Filed under Curiosities, Health, Paul

Lower Than What?

In which we revisit and update two of my favorite rant topics, idiot drivers and telemarketers. May there be a special level of hell reserved for the both of them.


Here’s the scene: 101 Freeway, southbound (by which I mean headed due east, but that’s a different rant) through Westlake Village. 55 mph zone and there are a fair number of vehicles filling the four lanes, but we’re moving along at 55 to 60. The #1 and #2 lanes are both pretty well packed, with a couple of late-returning holiday campers blocking my view of the #1 lane. #4 lane is full heading off into the distance. I’m in the #3 lane with cars behind me, but no one ahead of me for quite a ways.

Coming up behind and on my right in the “exit only” offramp (#5) lane is a dude in a fast, hot car. He has apparently cut off into that lane with no intent of exiting, floored it up to about 85 in order to pass a dozen or so cars, then cut back into the #4 lane at the last second before the exit. There’s no place to go in the #4 lane, so he cuts off the guy in back of me to pull in behind me. There’s no place else to go but he can see lots of open road ahead of me, so he honks once and then starts flashing his lights at me.

He’s obviously someone Very Important and he’s driving a Very Hot Car. Who am I to stand in his way? I bow to his Importantness and his car’s Hotness, signal, and move over into the #4 lane. As expected, His Very Important Lead-Footedness floors it and is doing about 90 by the time he gets clear of the campers in the #2 lane.

Oops! I’m sorry. Did he not see the CHP patrol car in the #1 lane on the other side of those campers, “leading” the “parade” of cars doing 55 to 60 in the 55 mph zone? I guess I just assumed that His Very Important Lead-Footedness knew about it and wanted to drive like an idiot anyway.

My bad!


The Los Angeles Times had an article yesterday about how the FCC is proposing to change the rules to make it much easier for telecommunication companies to identify and block robocalls and telemarketers. (For convenience and brevity, “robocallers and telemarketers” will heretofore to be referred to as “LTWS,” as in “Lower Than Whale Shit”.) Not surprisingly, this is the number one complaint that they get from consumers.

The technology exists. If you get your phone using VOIP, there are programs which will detect the program at the originating end as an LTWS tool and simply ignore it. Apparently the FCC rules as they stand now are ambiguous at best and most telecoms believe that they are not allowed to do the same for POTS & conventional landline phones.

The FCC is changing this, so that soon (please, please let it be SOON) PacBell or AT&T or Verizon or whoever will be able to offer a service (I’m sure we’ll pay for it, but it will be worth it in my book) so that LTWS calls simply never ring through to your phone. It might not be quite that simple – you might have to block callers one by one as they come in, or possibly “whitelist” numbers that you will accept calls from. But the bottom line is that the local phone companies will be able to jump into the battle to block LTWS calls.

I’ve speculated before on the best way to deal with LTWS calls. Ignore them? Simply pick it up and then hang up? Take out your frustrations and practice creative cursing on them? See how long you can keep them on the phone to waste their time? Try to derive some entertainment from simply screwing with their heads?

This last offers some great opportunities for creativity. I always think, “WWRWD?” (What would Robin Williams do?) Pretend to not speak English? Make odd, bodily function-ish noises at them? Parrot back everything they say? Ask them to repeat something more slowly because you’re taking notes for your FBI report and you didn’t catch that part? Lead them along while occasionally tooting your vuvuzela at them? (“Tooting your vuvuzela” is not a euphemism, by the way.) Pick any Robin Williams, Jonathan Winters, or Lily Tomlin character and answer their questions in that voice and character? Switch between characters at random? Start asking them pointed questions about their favorite sex toys and alternative uses for them?

The list goes on and on, but yesterday I got a LTWS call right after reading the LA Times article. My brain went into a completely different direction.

“Hello, I’d like to speak to Paul. Is this Paul?”

I respond with a guttural, Neanderthal-like grunt or two.

“Sir, I’d like to talk to you today…”

“The FCC’s coming for you,” I said using my low-pitched, deep “radio voice.” Think Billy Bob Thorton in “Sling Blade.”

“I’m sorry, what?”

“The FCC’s coming for you. You’re all going to jail!” Punctuate deep radio voice with high-pitched, maniacal laugh, then back to radio voice with weird, indeterminate accent. “FCC’s gonna gitcha, boy!” Grunt again a couple of times, then work your way into your best evil villain, mad scientist, “Mwwaaaaahahahaha!!” laugh.

Click.

When I’m paying PacBell $1.50 a month to block the LTWS calls, there might be days when I actually need a call or two like this to respond to, just to cheer me up. Maybe there will be a service that allows you to let LTWS calls through for the next twelve hours, for use in just such a situation.

For an additional $1.50 a month, no doubt.

 

4 Comments

Filed under Distracted Driving, Farce, Freakin' Idiots!, Paul

Eustachian Tube Stakes

There are a couple of great ideas rolling around in my head, just waiting to get written out and posted here. (Really, there are!) Unfortunately, there may also be alien larvae or something else equally horrifying in there.

Four weeks ago, when I was in Washington, I started to come down with a cold. As I usually do, I hit it hard with Cold Eeze (zinc lozenges), Dayquil, and Nyquil, and it cleared up in a day or two. Except for my eustachian tubes.

For those not familiar, those are the tubes connecting your ears to your sinuses. When you “pop” your ears with a change in pressure (like going up or down a mountain, or in a plane) it’s to equalize the pressure in those tubes. If you have them really well blocked and fly anyway, it can lead to excruciating pain.

I had them blocked and flew anyway.

Fine, had to get home. Figured that it would clear up along with the cold in a few days. Constantly trying to yawn or wiggle my jaw to clear them was a pain in the ass, but no big deal for a day or so.

Thirty days later…

Let’s skip all of the grisly details and just say that it’s non-fatal, but really, really annoying. And it’s such a stupid little thing! I’ve tried all of the suggested treatments from my hospital’s online site, the Mayo Clinic’s site, WebMD, and FamilyDoctor.org. I’ve taken this, and that, and drunk this, and eaten that.

Nada.

OK, even for such a “stupid little thing,” tomorrow I see the doctor. I want a prescription for a big, long piece of surgical-grade pipe cleaner to put in this ear, pull out the other, then run back and forth like Bugs Bunny or Daffy Duck would to clear it up.

Or better meds than I can get over the counter. Same thing.

Leave a comment

Filed under Health, Paul

Boston (Part Six)

It’s finally time to wrap up this visit to Boston, one of my favorite cities. (I’m sure we’ll be back here sooner or later.) So far we have walked The Freedom Trailstarting at Boston Common, seen the Old State House and Faneuil Hall, gone through Paul Revere’s house and the Old North Church, went through the USS Cassin Young in the Charlestown Navy Yard, then showed off the USS Constitution.

IMG_7421 small

Leaving the USS Constitution and the Charlestown Navy Yard, one last thing that caught my eye. While it’s a routine item in Boston, it’s a funny looking oddity to someone who’s lived too long in Southern California. I had to stop and wonder, why does this fire hydrant have an antenna? Are the fire hydrants here all connected to the Internet or linked to the other fire hydrants? Are these really, really high tech fire hydrants in one of our country’s oldest cities?

Obviously not. (I’m goofy and silly, but not that goofy and silly.) It’s just there to warn the snowplow drivers about the hydrant’s presence so that they don’t sheer it off when clearing the the street while the snow’s three or four feet deep. Or, if this corner of the lot hasn’t been cleared at all, it lets the fire department find the hydrant underneath the snow in the event of an emergency. Although that might not have been much use this last winter when they had ten to fifteen to twenty feet or more of snow piled up.

IMG_7578 small

Heading back up the hill and inland from the Charlestown Navy Yard, you’ll remember that we found this statue on the Charlestown Training Ground. I want to know who cleans it – it’s surprisingly clear of “pigeon residue” for a big city statue.

IMG_7517 small

Three blocks up from the Training Ground you’ll find the Bunker Hill Monument. I knew it was there because the maps said it should be, and I had seen it sticking up from a distance when crossing the Charles River. But the townhouses and apartment buildings along those blocks are a couple stories high, the streets are tree-lined, so I remember being surprised to come out from between them and suddenly find a large, open area with the monument.

IMG_7522 small

Colonel William Prescott was one of the leaders of the revolutionary military movement in 1775 Boston. On June 17, 1775, the American revolutionary militia took on a much larger British force in the “Battle of Bunker Hill.” The battle is considered to be the first significant battle in the American Revolution. The British forces, while ultimately able to prevail in three assaults on the militia positions, had over 800 injured and 200 killed from their force of 2,200. The Americans forces suffered 100 killed and more than 300 injured before retreating.

However, the “Battle of Bunker Hill” was not fought on Bunker Hill. Bunker’s Hill is about 600 yards inland. The monument, statues, and the legend have the name, but the battle was actually fought on Breed’s Hill. Prescott had been ordered to put his fortifications on Bunker’s Hill, but had decided that Breed’s Hill was a better defensive position, despite being lower, less steep to climb, and much closer to the British positions. The monument is at the site of the battle, but despite the name, it’s Breed’s Hill, not Bunker’s Hill.

IMG_7528 small

The Bunker Hill Monument is 221 feet tall and was completed in 1843. There’s an obvious comparison to the Washington Monument in Washington, completed in 1884, which at 555 feet is two and a half times taller.

Legend has it that, due to the severe shortage of gunpowder and musket balls that the American troops had, Prescott gave his troops the famous order, “Don’t shoot until you see the whites of their eyes!” While it’s true that the Americans held their fire until the British were quite close (and then shot at the officers first in order to cause chaos), the “whites of their eyes” order was never given. It’s a fiction, created much later to dress up the story.

It’s an impressive monument for an American defeat, especially with all of the incorrect information regarding the battle itself. What is undeniably true about the battle is that it proved to the British that this minor uprising of a few malcontents was going to be much more widespread and difficult. It was going to be a much, much longer battle than they expected, and it was going to cost them far more than they would ever have believed.

IMG_7533 small

Unlike the Washington Monument, where you get up and down by elevator (there are stairs, but they’ve been off-limits for decades), you get to the top of the Bunker Hill Monument by climbing the stairs. Two hundred and ninety-four steps. The stairwell is steep and narrow. You are warned, repeatedly, by park rangers at the bottom, that you really need to make sure you want to make the climb and you’re physically in shape to make the climb. There was a charming young lady there, maybe in her mid to late 20’s, who asked me if I really knew what I was getting into, suggested that I not climb, and then gave me that smug, silent, “Reallllly?” look.

Of course I’m in good enough shape! Maybe I was over fifty and carrying a few pounds that I would like to lose, but had I not just walked the entire Freedom Trail? Am I not a macho, stud muffin of a manly man?

Though. I. Was. Going. To. DIE!

The worst part was the tweens and teens scampering by me like they were floating. Rotten little brats. (The climb really isn’t that bad if you’re in reasonably good shape, but your thighs will be feeling it if you’re not used to hill climbing or using the StairMaster.)

IMG_7553 small

Perseverance will give you some great views back toward Boston. There’s a somewhat cramped observation floor at the top, with windows looking out in all four directions. You can look down on Logan Airport to your east, inland toward Cambridge and Harvard, or north toward the Mystic River area and Malden. Here you can see the downtown area to the south, with the spire of the Old North Church visible on the far left side, just across the Charles River.

IMG_7580 small

Having survived the Bunker Hill Monument (it’s a lot easier climbing down than it is up, and my smug “told you so!” look at the park ranger there wasn’t quite as effective as I wanted since I was sweating like a pig), it was time to head back toward Boston. In theory I could have called a cab – but where’s the fun in that?! I had to get back to meet with The Long-Suffering Wife after she got out of her conference, so I took far fewer pictures on the way back and concentrated on making tracks.

Which, of course, is not to say that I took no pictures on the way back. Just before crossing back over the river into North Boston I found City Square Park, which is a new-ish, one-acre park created early in “The Big Dig.” The Big Dig was a highway project that took over 20+ years and over $22B in an attempt to expand the freeways cutting through the heart of the city by burying them under the existing skyscrapers and houses. (The word “boondoggle” is thrown about quite a bit, and many Bostonians will still start twitching a bit when you mention it.) Directly under City Square Park are some of the freeway tunnels and connecting ramps between US Highway 1 and Interstate 93.

The park is full of all sorts of sculptures, many of fish and other odd creatures. I found them to be extremely fun and whimsical. I also found some quiet and shade and a place to sit for ten minutes. (My thighs were still feeling the whole 294-steps thing.) This fountain and weather vane are in the center of the park.

IMG_7584 small

While there, I also talked to some of the local residents, one of whom was nice enough to take my picture. Of special note are the pasty-white legs, the Angels hat (just to provoke a response), my favorite white-water rafting T-shirt (“The orange vest doesn’t make you safer, just easier to find”), the sacred sunglasses, and the backpack that’s been ’round the world a couple of times carrying my cameras.

Compare this outfit to the slightly more hideous one I displayed while being a tourist in Shanghai. Same hat, glasses, shoes, pasty white, and backpack, but obviously when I want to look like a “classy” tourist I wear a Hawaiian shirt instead of a T-shirt!

Go see Boston, walk the Freedom Trail. Also go to a game at Fenway, see the Boston Pops outside, got to Harvard Square, go down to Quincy to see all of the John Adams sites, go out to Cape Cod. It’s a great city.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Paul, Photography, Travel

Baseball Tense(ion)

Listening to the Angels game on the radio this afternoon, I heard something that sounded like incorrect grammar, but it took me a while to figure out why it sounded wrong. I’m still not 100% sure that it was wrong.

The phrase in question was something like, “Back in the third inning, Jones pinched hit for Smith.”

OK, “pinched” is the past tense for “pinch,” as in “Now I’m going to pinch you” as opposed to “Yesterday she pinched me.”

At the same time, “hit” is the same for both present and past tense, as in “Come on, hit it!” as opposed to “It was great the way she hit it.”

But in this case, “pinch” in “pinch hit” isn’t a verb, it’s a adverb, a modifier of the verb “hit.” So shouldn’t the past tense of “pinch hit” be “pinch hit”?

A Google search brings up no definitive answer, but does offer some interesting avenues for a wild goose chase off into a classic Web surfing session. A Bing search brings up no definitive answer, but does make you wonder why in hell you bothered to waste time using Bing.

Asking Siri is useless, but entertaining if you waste time trying to figure out if you can ask a question that will get her upset enough to stop talking to you. So far, no joy.

I’m going to go with my gut on this one. “Pinched hit” – nice try, but wrong. “Pinch hit” – gets my vote as correct.

Leave a comment

Filed under LA Angels, Paul, Sports

Thingamabobs – May 22nd

I’ve always found that there are odd little thingamabobs out there in the world. Things that are just a bit “off.” I suspect that most folks would just shrug and move on when encountering these thingamabobs, but I’ve always found them to be worth a second look and further examination.

I like to think my attitude is a result of my retention of a child-like sense of wonder and awe at the amazing universe around us. Others just think that I’m “easily amused.” (They very well might be correct.)

Today’s example is a soda can that spontaneously became an “outie” instead of an “innie.”

IMG_9170

IMG_9171

IMG_9172

IMG_9175

IMG_9176

I know that it happened spontaneously because I was holding the carton it was in when it happened. It was one of those twelve-packs that’s intended to fit into your fridge and dispense one can at a time. I had just gotten home from the grocery store, set the case down on the floor, and felt the case shudder and thump, with a quite audible metallic sound.

I assumed that one of the cans had ruptured and I was going to need to clean up lemonade from all over the kitchen. I hadn’t set the sodas down very hard or on anything sharp, but something had triggered some sort of reaction.

Opening up the case, expecting to find sticky soda spraying everywhere, instead I found all twelve cans to be quite intact and clean. Eleven were perfectly normal, with both ends in the usual concave configuration. This one can had both ends pushed out to be convex.

From an engineering and science background, it made sense that this could have happened. The reason the ends are concave to begin with is because that  shape is very structurally sound to resist and contain the internal pressure from the soda’s gas. This is particularly true on this kind of can which is formed from a single piece of aluminum.

But having the ends concave (“innie”) is only one solution to the structural strength equation. An equally valid solution is to have the two ends convex (“outie”). Think about other large tanks used for containing volumes of liquid or gas under pressure. The Space Shuttle’s external tank. The tanks at the gas station or in your back yard that contain propane. The trucks that haul cold, liquid gases such as nitrogen or oxygen. They’re all shaped like long, narrow tubes with convex ends.

The fact that the huge, industrial strength containers use the convex ends makes me think that it might be because that configuration is stronger than the convex design. I might have to dig out and dust off some math textbooks to test that. (Ed. note: I won’t, don’t worry – I said might.) But the convex shape doesn’t lend itself to containers that can need to stand up on the ground or be stacked.

Think of fire extinguishers, or those big steel containers that contain helium for blowing up party balloons. They’re all flat on the bottom to make them easy stand up, but inside they’re rounded. (Convex or concave? Sounds like a question for “How It’s Made.”)

For soda cans, it’s a huge benefit if they can be stacked and stand up on their own. They also only have to withstand fairly low pressures. The solution there is to make both ends concave. Which is why they’re that way…

…until that rare moment when something snaps on one can and it flips from one stable configuration to one that might be slightly more stable from a pure standpoint, even if it does make it impossible to stand the can on its end.

It’s still amazing to me that it can do that without splitting open the aluminum – but there’s your proof.

(Kevin MacNamara, a high school friend, was the first to point out that I am “easily amused.” See, I still haven’t proven him wrong!)

Leave a comment

Filed under Curiosities, Paul